About Me

Name: Ron Maestri
Email: contact@ronmaestri.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Leading the Horse.

Recent polls now show John McCain and Sarah Palin at 50% with Barack Obama and Joe Biden at 46%. It seems the tide has turned as I have predicted. As much as I hate to say it, I told you so.”

It's easy to see when you pay attention. Even with the sound off, watching the rivals on TV seems backward. One would've guessed a Joe Biden type would have been on the McCain ticket and the Sarah Palin type would've been on the Obama side. If you were casting a feature film, that's certainly the direction you'd take it. So now, instead of youth, excitement, and change on the side that declared it as its' own, we have anything but. And on the side that seemed as though it represented the same old “George Bush 3rd term” politics, we have youthful thinking, excitement and change ahead of us.

The plot certainly has thickened.

I invite anyone to go back and read any of my previous blog postings on townhall.com and compare what I've said with the dates/times they were posted. You will find in every instance I have predicted what ultimately had become fact. Again, it's easy to see when you pay attention and I do.

Here's more. We all know what happens when we lead a horse to water. He doesn't drink. The same is true again (and again, written previously in my blogs of the past) with the liberal media's attempts to lead us to that water. We won't drink. Keith Olbermann's big exclusive with Barack Obama was ho-hum because Keith Olbermann isn't a journalist we can trust, despite his daily references to himself as “your humble journalist.” He's a democratic cheerleader. You'll never see any exclusives with anyone representing the right, because Keith wants you to drink his water, so take a big gulp and be sure to write “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” in your Nielson diary. The same is true of Chris Matthews who can't possibly say anything negative about the democratic ticket, except for once in a while pretending to play hard ball in hopes he'll appear un-biased. You better drink his water right now, if you know what's good for you or he'll never let you complete a sentence.

I'd be amazed if I'm the only one who sees any of this. Clearly MSNBC doesn't, if two far left leaning programs on their schedule weren't enough, soon they'll have three, because they're giving Rachel Maddow her own show. You know Rachel don't you? She's the star/choreographer/director/producer/executive producer/casting director and key grip of “The Rachel Maddow Show” which airs on AirAmerica radio, TV and podcasts. Oh yeah, AirAmerica is liberal. She's described as a political analyst every time she appears on one of MSNBC's other shows. But you see, she isn't. She has never provided a fair assessment of any republican candidate or strategy ever and in fact, trips over herself to come to the defense of anything Obama. At one point it was so bad, Joe Scarborough, filling in for David Gregory on "Race For The White House" on MSNBC, had to playback specific comments from Barack Obama for Rachel's behalf several times because she refused to acknowledge them on their face and instead chose to decipher their meaning for us. If you were dyslexic and retarded, you might have seen things her way and dammit, she sure as hell tried. She's no political analyst. She's a democratic strategist. So there's MSNBC and lovely Rachel baiting and switching us so we'll drink their water. No thanks. It's polluted.

The well just got much deeper by the supreme being herself, Oprah Winfrey, who has pronounced that she will not have any political candidates on her show before the election. You mean, except for Barack Obama, Oprah? Forgive me for questioning one of your commandments, but don't you mean you won't have any republican candidates on your show before the election, Ms. Winfrey? Shall I peel you a grape?

The lesson to be learned from all this is soon to come, I'm afraid. Try as hard as they will force feeding their points of view will soon backfire, which is the real tragedy in all this. Real Americans like myself are interested in the facts, not the slanted rhetoric from self-described “journalists” who aren't. What would their Columbia professors think of them now, I wonder. The writing is on the wall and it will only get worse unless the liberal press (radio, TV and newspaper) backs off, goes back to the basic premise of what real journalism is supposed to be (and not to be) and let us decide the facts on their merits. The RNC should send thank-you cards for all their help, because the harder they try, the harder they will be fall.

Thank heavens for fair and balanced press like The New York Post, who yesterday endorsed McCain/Palin, writing an incredibly poignant editorial as to the reasons why. Anyone still fooled by who Obama/Biden really are should read this. Kudos to that paper and its' parent, News Corporation, for telling it like it really is without bias. If anyone reading this still questions whether or not a democrat in the white house would be better for our economy than a republican, I invite them to compare New York with Las Vegas. New Yorkers, in a blue state controlled by democrats long before FDR was governor, pay a whopping $9 for a pack of cigarettes, while Nevadans pay a mere $3.50 per pack. So what's the difference between the cigarettes out there vs. those out here? TAX. Now unless cigarettes in New York are wrapped in gold, New Yorkers pay almost $6 more than Nevadans just for tax. Nevada a red state. New York a blue state. Connect the dots, and I don't even smoke but for God sakes, ENOUGH already! Democrats=big government, big tax. Republicans= don't.

Need more? Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY) rents not 1, not 2, not 3 but 4 rent controlled apartments in Harlem under the guise of office space. Never mind that the units must be for living and not for business purposes. Mr. Rangel doesn't care because he's a democrat who lives for big government and big pet projects and big perks like 4 rent controlled units that cost him less than one studio apartment in Manhattan. Democrats in congress are just as bad. Even our own Governor Paterson calls these types of legistlators Draculas. They'll be real nice to you by day, and then suck your blood for everything it's worth until they get what they want, like Dracula. Barack Obama was weened from the same bottle. His refusal to admit the troop surge is working was because he was afraid to alienate his own party, not us. He failed miserably.

I'm happy to watch them all scramble and try so very hard to convince me otherwise, all so they can keep their cushy government jobs and live like kings while the rest of us struggle. Then, like a horse, I'll do the opposite. I for one would be very happy to drink from that trough.

Ron Maestri
www.ronmaestri.com



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yesterday.

Yesterday certainly was a big day in presidential politics. In one fell swoop, John McCain swooped in with an out-of-the-ballpark nominee for vice-president, a great speech, proving his credentials with facts, not lingo. If I were advising him, I'd tell him to remind America that the gridlock came from a democratically controlled congress, whose own job approval ratings are in the high single digits.
 
It's obvious Americans have seen the same old movie before when politicians deliver the world to get themselves elected, and then do nothing until about the final year of their terms when they're up for re-election, and then off they go again having parties and cutting secret deals for bridges to nowhere. Richard Nixon mastered the art when he promised to end the Vietnam War to get himself elected the first time, never did, and then promised it again to get himself re-elected. Thank God Americans are much smarter than that. It's not just change we're after, it's accountability. How much can we trust they'll deliver on their words?
 
It's obvious what I'm saying (and have been saying) is the case. Last night on "The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric", she showed two polls. The first, taken immediately after the Obama rock concert: Obama 48% and McCain 40%. The second, taken a few weeks later, one day BEFORE Sarah palin's speech, showed both candidates dead even at 42%. What's wrong with that picture?
 
But wait, there's more. WCBS-TV, the local New York CBS affiliate asked respondants online "How likely would you be to vote for McCain/Palin after hearing her speech?" A whopping 73% responded most likely with less than 10% still unsure. NEW YORK IS A BLUE STATE! These are not words of hope for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Clearly this election is theirs to lose unless something is radically changed, and I know what it is. Now mind you, I'm the type of person who typically roots for the underdog. I guess all my years in direct marketing taught me how to spin gold from sheet metal, so trust me on this. I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for Obama and would like to offer my friendly advice, because honestly, I love a good horse race.
 
Joe Biden needs to resign from the democratic ticket. He needs to come up with some credible reason why, and just do it. You know, for the good of the party? Barack Obama should accept the resignation and then in the same breath name Hillary Rodham Clinton as his new VP running mate. I'm dead serious. We all know Hillary's strengths and we can all now begin to see the void she left will only get deeper and stronger for McCain/Palin unless Obama punts fast.
 
Mark my words. Barack Obama will lose this election unless he makes this "change".
 
Yesterday.
 
Ron Maestri
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Obama-Biden Double Flusher.

Well, alright let's just stop the presses for today's big ho-hum announcement by Barack Obama...he's chosen Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) as his running mate.

Yawn. This choice is what I and so many of us refer to as the official double flusher. You know, the one that's such a full load it takes two attempts to take it all down. To be more specific, that dog has fleas.

Doesn't anyone get it, or am I the only one? If you were casting an exciting event, who would you have chosen as the picture-perfect candidate alongside Barack Obama? All together now, HILLARY.

Choosing Biden without ever considering Mrs. Clinton (which of course Obama claimed he would...wink, wink) is like ordering a side of mayonnaise to go with your homemade gnocci. It doesn't work, and on so many levels I've already lost count.

 
But first, a little something about Senator Joe Biden. When I guest hosted a week for hometown radio station WGMD-FM in Rehoboth, DE., a very powerful news/talk radio station serving all of Delmarva, I tried getting Senator Biden as a guest while he was running for president. The only thing I received was a polite brush off from one of his underlings stating, “The Senator is much too busy criss-crossing the country for appearances in very important big states. Thanks anyway.”
 
Oh, forgive me for assuming the same people who elected Mr. Biden to the senate for over 35 years have any less than a big voice. Even though his 'appearance' on my show would have entailed nothing more than a phone-in (which would've been faster than a trip to the urinal), I still think it would have been a courtesy and frankly, an obligation to the people he's supposed to really serve.

Obama's “change” scenario was a good idea, for about a minute. By choosing Joe Biden as his running mate, the only thing he's changed is his own brand. Starbucks is now selling Folgers. He's selected a Washington insider who also happened to vote for the war in Iraq and who's own knee-jerk reactions offered some damaging (and very true) quips about Senator Obama's ability to be Commander-in-Chief. If Barack was worried about Hillary (and Bill) upstaging him, wait 'til he gets a load of Joe. It was funny to see the scared look on Obama's face as they strolled for pictures practically hand-in-hand. The only thing missing was a forced singing of “Feelings” to complete the ensemble. If Obama were to become our next President, each day in the Oval Office would probably start with, "What else did he say today?", and "How are my numbers compared to his?"

I can read between the lines. Obama is worried. He knows what the Republicans is saying is true and that's why he went the way he did. Calls to Oprah will probably go unanswered after this snafu. I'd give anything to be a fly on the wall today watching Bill and Hillary at home naked enjoying chocolate dipped strawberries and mimosas, setting things up for that 2012 presidential run. Every day forward is two steps back for Mr. Obama. I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for him now, and more inspired than ever for Mrs. Clinton (whose Botox injections have really been working.)

 
One more thing about Barack Obama. If you were an Iranian, North Korean or leader from any other country that hates us, what would be the first thing you'd do to placate this new president whose was willing to sit down with you and chat? You'd overwhelm him with praise and adulation like Hollywood does to actors to get them off their back, which of course would work just as well because he'd eat it right up. Then you'd stab him in the back. That's because the star of the show in Barack Obama's eyes is and always will be Barack Obama. Conversely, the star of the show in John McCain's eyes, is and always will be America. His own maverick track record has proven that. I still maintain Hillary should be his VP choice. They'd sweep the country, not to mention New York in an election that would probably result in a more embarrassing outcome than Nixon-McGovern in 1972. Oh, that's right, wasn't it George McGovern who was quick to offer advice to Hillary about getting out for the good of the party?
 
Flush twice, then get the spray.
 
Ron Maestri
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »